[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscand
From: |
JEDIDIAH |
Subject: |
Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling) |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:01:50 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux) |
On 2010-09-21, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> RJack wrote:
>>
>> Since there will be a rush to declare that all software is licensed and
>> the tangible medium (the copy) is only leased, *ALL HELL WILL BREAK
>> LOOSE* when those states with retail sales taxes find they can no longer
>> collect the tax levied on retail software sales. That'll be fun to watch.
>>
>> When a potential copyright licensee is legally authorized under 17 USC
>> 106(2) to copy software onto a physical medium that he already owns,
>> there can be no question that the licensee owns that copy. There will
>
> Since GNUtards believe that GPL licensees must follow the GPL ('not a
...which incidentally primarily only restricts "use" that is generally
completely disallowed by just about any other license.
[deletia]
You are a fountain of bad analogies.
--
Nothing quite gives you an understanding of mysql's |||
popularity as does an attempt to do some simple date / | \
manipulations in postgres.
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), (continued)
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), JEDIDIAH, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling),
JEDIDIAH <=
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), JEDIDIAH, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Snit, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), Snit, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling), Snit, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Snit, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08