[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stuttgart 21 protests

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Stuttgart 21 protests
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:04:07 -0000

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> carries a label such as "RB" or "RE".  I suspect a lot of councillors who
> voted for this scheme were suffering the same confusion.  I agree, 160
> trains a day would fit comfortably into an 8 platform station.  600
> trains won't.

Blah blah blah.

The facts are that the planned theoretical maximum for S21 is 72 trains
per hour with practical target around 50 per hour at maximum. The
current peak hour utilization is around 47 trains per hour (that's
according to the protesters -- I don't know if the count of 47 is not
inflated). So the target of 51 is thus fully acceptable.


"Plaintiff Erik Andersen is a work-from-home father who has gifted 
to the world software underlying a significant body of consumer
electronics." ROFL
                     -- SFLC crooks Ravicher, Williamson, Spiegel
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]