Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling)

[Alexander Terekhov]

RJack wrote:
> 
> On 11/18/2010 12:24 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >
> > http://www.citizen.org/documents/Vernor_Autodesk_Petition_Rehearing.pdf
> >
> 
> One of the best researched and argued legal petitions I have ever read.
> 
> This is a great document, which could easily serve as a basis for future
> petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Autodesk's 156-page (WOW) Response to Vernor's Petition for En Banc
Rehearing: 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/43215193/Vernor-vs-Autodesk-Autodesk-Response-to-Rehearing-Requst-November-10-2010

The motto: 

    Tangible Copies Of Software Can Be Licensed.

Uh retards.

Tangible copies can be LEASED/RENTED/BORROWED. 

Autodesk contends:

"For example, tangible copies of motion pictures are routinely
distributed to theatres pursuant to a license for their exhibition."

Uh idiots. 

Copies of motion pictures are sold/rented/borrowed to theatres. What is
licensed is the right of public display spelled in 17 USC 106 (5).

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)