[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:15:27 +0100

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Oral argument in Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation:


Apple suggests that replacing OS/X bootloader with Psystar's bootloader
creates utterly forbidden "derivative work of OS/X".

Apple is utterly unaware of private adaptations under 17 USC 117 and
suggests that creation and private use of such derivative works is also
forbidden under copyright law.

Apple confuses its monopoly on OS/X compatible computers with imaginary
monopoly on operating systems.

Psystar points out that Apple attempt to block Psystar from breaking
Apple monopoly on OS/X compatible computers using copyright law remedies
is utter misuse of copyright.

Well, if Apple wins on appeal it would simply prove one more time that
the is indeed full of sillies very often overturned by


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]