[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:03:14 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6

On 11/30/2010 2:46 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
First ever official court denials against Bradley Kuhn

Pretty weak sauce:
    To the extent Plaintiffs are arguing that CMA or WD is
    guilty of copyright infringement through its own use
    of the Infringing Assets, Plaintiffs may amend the
    Complaint to plead facts specific to CMA or WD's alleged
    infringing activity.
    For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to join
    respondents is denied as to CMA. Plaintiffs' motion to
    join WD is denied, without prejudice, subject to
    Plaintiffs' decision to refile following an evidentiary
    hearing on the issues ofwhether the asset sale amounted
    to a merger between WDE and WD and whether WD substantially
    continued WDE's business.

The denials have to do with the details of bankrupt companies
selling off assets, and have nothing to do with the copyright

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]