Re: The great BusyBox fraud continues

[RayLopez99]

On Jun 4, 5:40 am, RJack <u...@example.net> wrote:

> Erik Andersen continues to claim ownership of BusyBox v0.60.2 although
> he has contributed no executable code to the compiled BusyBox binary at
> all -- it doesn't get any more dishonest than this. It would be a
> toss-up to decide who is the bigger liar -- The Sofware Freedom
> Conservancy INC or SCO Inc.
>
> If Western Digital's attorneys allow this rank, fraudulent request for
> default judgment to proceed, they should be restricted to practicing law
> in Siberia.
>

Right.  And they won't.  This is just another IP troll attempt, this
time by the Linux crowd, to extract money from corporations in the
legal arena after having failed in the marketplace.  Opera browser did
it with Microsoft in Europe.

RL