Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[Alexander Terekhov]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> LMAO!
> 
> 01/31/2011 163  MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Document filed by
> Erik Andersen, Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc..(Ravicher, Daniel)
> (Entered: 01/31/2011)
> 01/31/2011 164  MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 163 MOTION for
> Preliminary Injunction.. Document filed by Erik Andersen, Software
> Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. (Ravicher, Daniel) (Entered: 01/31/2011)
> 01/31/2011 165  DECLARATION of Erik Andersen in Support re: 163 MOTION
> for Preliminary Injunction.. Document filed by Erik Andersen, Software
> Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit
> 2)(Ravicher, Daniel) (Entered: 01/31/2011)
> 01/31/2011 166  DECLARATION of Bradley M. Kuhn in Support re: 163 MOTION
> for Preliminary Injunction.. Document filed by Erik Andersen, Software
> Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. (Ravicher, Daniel) (Entered: 01/31/2011)

>From SFLC's comical filing:

"Absent an injunction, Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Best Buy
and Phoebe Micro's continuing distribution of BusyBox in violation of
the terms of the GPL. On the other hand, enjoining Best Buy and Phoebe
Micro from infringing activities, namely their continued unauthorized
distribution of BusyBox will not pose a hardship to them, as they each
distribute many other products not relevant to this case. By issuing a
preliminary injunction and enforcing compliance with the GPL, the Court
will ensure the vitality of free and open source licensing, namely
ensuring that recipients have the right to modify software source code
to make the software on their devices better."

How the fuck NOT "ensuring that recipients have the right to modify
software source code to make the software on their devices better"
translates to irreparable harm to plaintiffs? What are the SFLC fellas
smoking? They are not asking for specific performance (in the sense that
the court would force defendants to comply). How would the stop of
distribution ensure "that recipients have the right to modify software
source code to make the software on their devices better". Uh sillies.

"The absence of a preliminary injunction will cause Plaintiffs to lose
control over the modification and distribution of BusyBox and the
considerable market share and reputation they have established in
BusyBox, both of
which are harms that have no adequate remedy at law."

What the fuck is "considerable market share" for an IP work priced at
zero, "reputation" aside for a moment?

Hey Hyman, and ideas?

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)