[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why backquotes in GNU documentation?

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Why backquotes in GNU documentation?
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:24:48 +0900

Richard Kettlewell <> writes:
> Some fonts have the apostrophe represented by, approximately speaking,
> the mirror image of the grave accent.  In that case `htonl' looks like
> it has balanced quotes.
> These days ‘single’ and “double” quotes are available in Unicode.

Unicode quotes look better (on unicode-capable displays[*]), but also
make things much more annoying for any kind of programmatic handling of
the output.  The standard ` and ' are a reasonable compromise, I think.

[*] Well _usually_ look better... I've noticed cases where unicode
quotes are rendered so lightly that they end up being almost invisible...


Would you like fries with that?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]