Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[RJack]

On 4/27/2011 5:28 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Just in:
>
> 04/26/2011 194  ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A.
> Scheindlin from Emmett J. McMahon, dated 4/25/2011, re: Counsel for
> the defendant Best Buy Co., writes to request a pre-motion conference
> regarding a motion to strike Plaintiffs' claim for "actual damages
> and any additional profits of [Best Buy] incurred as the result of
> infringement." ENDORSEMENT: Request granted. A premotion conference
> will be held on May 6 at 2:30. So Ordered. (Pre-Motion Conference set
> for 5/6/2011 at 02:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin) (Signed by
> Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/25/2011) (lnl) (Entered: 04/26/2011)
>
> The letter:
>
> http://www.terekhov.de/194.pdf
>
> Best Buy says that Plaintiffs have suffered no damages at all.
>
> (And rightly so.)

You are soooooo right Alex! The plaintiffs aren't eligible for statutory
damages even *if* the registration were valid. Goodbye fraudulent
Bradley and Erik.

Hope they enjoy paying *all* the defendant's attorney fees in this matter.

Sincerely,
RJack :)