|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:06:21 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 6/17/2011 8:55 AM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 6/17/2011 8:47 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:The contradiction would be if the court would order not to pay attorney's fees.Do you believe that at the conclusion of a case, one party pays the attorney fees of another unless a court instructs them not to do so? How odd.
How else do you believe a badly losing plaintiff gets a winning defendant to agree to a stipulated Rule 41 voluntary dismissal "WITH PREDJUDICE"? Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |