On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Luca Saiu
<positron@gnu.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-09-08 at 16:38, Fabio Gonzalez wrote:
> So why do I say that a program for GNU/Linux. In reality there is a
> program for the GNU system, which also works with Linux. As GNU/Linux,
> a variant of the GNU system. Because it could be GNU/Hurd, which opine
> about it? If a program does not depend essentially Linux. We should
> mention that it is a program for GNU instead of GNU/Linux?
Indeed, saying just "GNU" does not place undue emphasis on Linux;
personally I try to do that when appropriate. If you can spend some
more words you can also say explicitly "GNU with any kernel" or
"GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd".
Regards,
- --
Luca Saiu
Home page: http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu
My blog: http://ageinghacker.net/blog
GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlBLgeAACgkQvzOavibF0ob2CwCeNQAioy+rZxSR/oZZfDc0RwMn
HrMAnRmA+f/18Ae+GK/mXaz77LbtdjCx
=arrc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----