[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation / Censorship
From: |
Daniel Pocock |
Subject: |
Re: Moderation / Censorship |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:41:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 14/01/2020 19:28, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> [2020-01-14 15:39]:
>> Dear moderators,
>>
>> A large part of the traffic over the last few weeks was repeated
>> ad-hominem attacks, always by the same people.
>>
>> This is a violation of the list’s stated policy at
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss>. It gives a
>> poor image of the project and undoubtedly silences many.
>>
>> I call on to you to make it stop. I reckon moderation is a tough and
>> thankless task, and I am grateful for your work, but I think it’s in the
>> project’s interest to put an end to abuse of that sort.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Ludo’.
>
> Then why did you start in the first place with defamation of GNU
> project and RMS?
>
> Reference:
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/
>
> It is violation of GUIX Code of Conduct.
Neither Moderation nor a Code of Conduct is a solution
We need to think outside the box about the way communication is effected
in free software communities.
It looks like the list is already moderated / censored. I posted a
message today and it took 59 minutes to be distributed. Check the
Received headers of messages you receive to see if that is happening to
other people.
Regards,
Daniel
- Moderation, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/14
- Re: Moderation, Jean Louis, 2020/01/14
- Re: Moderation, Carlos O'Donell, 2020/01/14
- Re: Moderation, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/01/14
- Re: Moderation, nylxs, 2020/01/15
- Re: Moderation, orbulon, 2020/01/15
- Re: Moderation, nylxs, 2020/01/16
- Re: Moderation, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/01/16
- Re: Moderation, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/01/16
Re: Moderation / Censorship,
Daniel Pocock <=