[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:26:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:29:45 +0000, Alex Taylor wrote:
> Finally "endorsing" the text would give the rebel group a legitimacy which
> they neither have, nor deserve. It's instructive to look at the track
> record of these renegades. The Guile and Guix projects have both excluded
> and/or vilified people who disagree with the people in power (the same
> people who push the "social contract"). If you choose to endorse this
> text, bear in mind that the words are imprecise so don't be surprised if,
> sometime down the road, your endorsement is used as a weapon against you
> when you fall out of favor with the powermongers.
While it's fine to disagree with a particular strategy for a group of
people, please avoid overly subjective and hyperbolic terms like
"powermonger"---it does not add anything constructive to already
inflamed discussion. Let's try to stick with stating facts, which can
be concretely debated effectively.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Mike Gerwitz <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Leo Famulari, 2020/02/24
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Daniel Pocock, 2020/02/27