Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

[Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)]

On 2020-02-22 19:38, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 20:48:43 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku 
> > (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
> > > On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > > > And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us
> > > > being
> > > > powermongers?
> > >
> > > https://wiki.gnu.tools/wiki:code-of-conduct
> > > "Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" ....
> > > You are sick.
> >
> > Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation? I find it
> > difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous 
> > insult
> > (following a message that was not even directed at them). Notice that 
> > there
> > is a pattern of overly aggressive messages by Kaz Kylheku.
>
> I think we can handle this without having to resort to blocking a
> person's messages.
>
> Kaz, please avoid use of subjective terms like "powermonger" and focus

Everything you see here has passed moderation.

If you don't think I should be able to include quotes of someone
else's text that contains "powermonger", take it up with the moderator.

>   https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html

I think that is useful for communication within projects themselves.
I don't think that should be blindly followed in a self-defeating way
by remaining meek when the project is under attack.