[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lese majeste
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: lese majeste |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:04:46 -0500 |
Just because you feel it is an insult doesn't mean that moderation is
the right solution. The GNU project doesn't take easy solutions which
lead to slipery and vauge arguments like this where "insult" is enough
to get someone silenced.
If you really want to help, I suggest you ask people to follow the GNU
Kind Communication Guidelines, and help in creating a welcoming
atmosphere not by asking for people to be moderated but by encouraging
kindness.
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/26
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Amin Bandali, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/22
- Re: lese majeste, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: lese majeste, orbulon, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23