[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:04:49 -0500 |
Hi Alex!
If you have time and interest, the GNU project is looking for new
maintainers for several projects. See our take action page:
https://www.gnu.org/server/takeaction.en.html
Contrary to the members of Manor farm, we welcome anyone and will not
dismiss your opinion just because you are not a GNU maintainer. This
list is for anyone interested in discussing anything related to the
GNU project, even disagreements with the GNU project.
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mark Wielaard, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, siddhesh, 2020/02/27
Message not availableRe: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/27