[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:18:25 -0500 |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:29:45AM +0000, Alex Taylor wrote:
> Finally "endorsing" the text would give the rebel group a legitimacy which
> they neither have, nor deserve. It's instructive to look at the track
> record of these renegades. The Guile and Guix projects have both excluded
> and/or vilified people who disagree with the people in power (the same
> people who push the "social contract").
What details can you provide about how the Guile and Guix projects "have
both excluded and/or vilified people"?
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Leo Famulari <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Daniel Pocock, 2020/02/27