[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:45:53 -0500 |
You claimed that your opinion doesn't matter, and that is quite
untrue. It is not something I nor anyone else claimed.
And that is what I was addressing, not if you and I might value things
differently, since that will obviously be the case. Specially in a
project where we do wish anyone to participate.
- Re: lese majeste, (continued)
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mark Wielaard, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, siddhesh, 2020/02/27
Message not availableRe: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Leo Famulari, 2020/02/24