[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:37:42 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 22:26:27 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> It took me a few days, but I finally came up with a concise summary of
> the situation:
>
> https://fsfellowship.eu/what-is-a-safe-space/
I am ashamed to have "free software" appear on this page and for anyone
to believe I or anyone else here may be affiliated with such an
extremist and horrific perspective. How dare you equate the ongoing
discussion with the slaughter of people.
This is not welcome on this list.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Leo Famulari, 2020/02/24
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Daniel Pocock, 2020/02/27
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Mike Gerwitz <=