Re: Web versions

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   Furthermore, how are we supposed to square Richard's call to action
   to replace non-free JS with free JS, if JS is to be understood to
   be inherently bad (as in the picture painted in this discussion)?

Nobody claimed anything like that, so why make the absurd claim?

Javascript isn't bad, it is how it is used that is the issue.  So
again, this is all nicley explained in for example, the Javascript
trap.