[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] further test revision

From: Daniel Bump
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] further test revision
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:50:31 -0800

Do the sgf files work from Trevor's regressions? Seems maybe broke.

Arend wrote:

> arb.tst:
> 200: Agree with Gunnar. I suggest to remove this problem, as there are too
> many plausible moves (M11, H4).

I agree this problem is clearly wrong but can wait for Teun (arb)
to maintain this file and the regression/games/arb directory. That
reminds me, we now have two contributors with the initials ab.

On the other hand Nicklas doesn't seem to be maintaining his regressions
any more so I used your patch for these tests.

> 1803: A6 is a nice tesuji.

I think A8 and A6 should both be accepted. The rationale for
A6 is that W can't fight the ko but that might be a little subtle
for GNU Go currently. A6 is the move played.

1102: You didn't mention this one but O9 should be accepted.
The ko will disappear after atari connect.

1205: Seems not such a good test.

> Nicklas5:
> 1203: I think K18 is playable, in fact I tend to favor it over the
> given alternatives. After B K18, W N18, B L19 (not N19 as in the game),
> W O18, B J16 B has a good attack and can make life at J18 if necessary.

Yes, it seems playable if B is willing to give up L15 as well as
the stones in the upper right. Here's some variations:

PW[GNU Go 3.1.13 (level 10) load and print]
GN[GNU Go 3.1.13 load and print Random Seed 1006053845]


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]