[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] Inge's patches

From: Inge Wallin
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Inge's patches
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:58:01 +0100 (MET)

Arend wrote:
> > Dan wrote:
> > > The two patches of Inge's seem beneficial on the basis
> > > of the regressions. 
> > 
> > That is nice although surprising.  The patches are purely
> > infrastructure and are not meant to change any regression results.
> > I think I will have a look and see what is going on.
> I think I can explain that. In discard_rules, there is the rule (which
> I adapted from the old code when I introduced the discard_rules in 3.1.17 or
> something)
>     tactical_move_vs_either_worm_known, REDUNDANT,
>     "  %1m: 0.0 - att. either/def. both involving %1m (direct att./def. as 
> well)\n"},

Yes, after I had written my mail I had a look at what happens and came
to the same conclusion.  However, I think that your line above might
be wrong since you cannot treat attack_either the same way as


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]