Re: [gnugo-devel] Replacement patterns

[Gunnar Farneback]

Dan wrote:
> This seems rather dangerous to me. For this to be correct
> we need to know that no two patterns can propose different
> replacements. It is difficult to verify this.

I'd rather crash than have one replacement mysteriously disappear in
development versions.

> Perhaps we should leave this in for now but when we've finished
> stress testing by playing about 1000 games we should take it
> out and not have this assertion in GNU Go 3.2.

It's fine with me to turn off the assertion in the stable release.

/Gunnar