Re: [gnugo-devel] more questionable moves?

[Evan Berggren Daniel]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Gunnar Farneback wrote:

> Evan wrote:
> > OK, I have another question.  This time I actually did some checking with
> > gnugo, making the move I thought better and seeing how gnugo played
> > against itself.  Gnugo gives up on the group of three on the left at move
> > 98, when if played against itself it can't find an attack to kill the
> > group in the lower left anyway.  Basically, the OWL stuff shouldn't be
> > counting the lower left group as critical, right?
>
> Yes. The owl code incorrectly finds an attack at A2. This is worth
> adding to the regressions.


OK.  I'll turn that into a regression test, unless that's already been
done?

Thanks

Evan Daniel