[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] use of LOSE in reading.c

From: Teun Burgers
Subject: [gnugo-devel] use of LOSE in reading.c
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:53:06 +0200

> Teun wrote:
> > This patch uses LOSE instead of 0 for acode
> > and dcode in reading.c. I think it is better
> > style to use LOSE than 0 since 0 can mean
> > just about everything.
> Sorry, but we're quite happy to use 0 in this context.

Who is we? Doesn't include me apparently.

> I don't find
> this change an improvement.

What is the point of the #define LOSE in gnugo.h then?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]