[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:55:33 -0800 |
> > Do you think we should change the testsuite to use reg_genmove before
> > the 3.4 release?
>
> Yes, I think we should. The main question is what to do with the tests
> using the optional random seed. We could either leave them as
> gg_genmove or review whether the random seed really is necessary
> today. Or possibly come up with some better mechanism.
How about leaving the random seeds as an undocumented feature
in GNU's implementation of reg_genmove.
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, pogonyshev, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, bump, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, bump, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, bump, 2003/03/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Heikki Levanto, 2003/03/13
Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Paul Pogonyshev, 2003/03/12
Re: [gnugo-devel] endgame tuning, Arend Bayer, 2003/03/22