|
From: | SP LEE |
Subject: | Re: [gnugo-devel] Uncertain defense certainly bad |
Date: | Tue, 01 Jul 2003 21:34:37 -0700 |
At the end of this message is a game where an uncertain owl defense is certainly bad. At move 104, GNU Go 3.3.22 plays a terrible move at R11. Not only is this worth -1 point with gote but it actually hurts W's eyeshape. After this move, a full eye becomes a half eye. The move is contributed by the pattern: Pattern D123 # tm New Pattern (3.1.17) # tm Modified (3.1.18) ??*?? expand eye shape, not in corner ?O.O? ?...? ----- :|,-,value(65) One possibility here is to make this pattern more specific. Consider: ??*?? expand eye shape, not in corner XO.OX ?...? ----- Assuming the X stones are not dead, the move at * does not contribute a half eye on the edge. The pattern could be split as follows: Pattern D123a ??*?? expand eye shape, not in corner oO.O? ?...? ----- :8,-,value(65) Pattern D123b ??*?? expand eye shape, not in corner XO.O? ?...? ----- :8,-,value(65) ??*?? expand eye shape, not in corner AO.O? ?...? ----- ; attack(A) This helps a little in the present situation. W still makes a small defensive move but at least it is not a harmful one. Dan
I have removed this pattern and have run all the regression tests. The result:
./regress.sh . owl.tst 4 unexpected FAIL: Correct '1 C12', got '1 B14' 80 unexpected PASS! ./regress.sh . neurogo.tst 13 unexpected FAIL: Correct '!P7', got 'P7' ./regress.sh . lazarus.tst 16 unexpected PASS! ./regress.sh . arend.tst 4 unexpected FAIL: Correct 'R14|S15|R17', got 'S16' ./regress.sh . nngs3.tst 390 unexpected PASS! 1000 unexpected PASS! ./regress.sh . nngs4.tst 470 unexpected PASS! ./regress.sh . arend2.tst 50 unexpected FAIL: Correct 'S14', got 'T13'For owl:4, B14 seems also to be a good move (I even think it's better than C12, which is too passive), because if B answers with C12, W can play C15 and then B has to defend the corner and W can live easily. A possible sequence is W:B14, B:C12, W:C15, B:D15, W:C16.
For neurogo:13, I don't think this pattern can solve the real problem, i.e. don't start a completely nonsense ko.
For arend:4, S16 seems to be a reasonable move too, at least it's not tenuki.
For arend2:50 I have to take more time to check it. SP Lee _________________________________________________________________The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |