[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:54:09 -0700 |
> On my Mac, "time make regression" gives the following results:
>
> 3.3.23 1050.970u 5.850s 23:24.91 75.2% 0+0k 1+23io 0pf+0w
> 3.2 1249.210u 6.040s 24:16.30 86.1% 0+0k 0+23io 0pf+0w
>
> All this using the defaults compile and run options. However, I'm not
> sure it proves anything since the regression tests themselves have
> changed. Is there a constant benchmarking test?
Are you are using the 3.2 testsuite with 3.2 and the 3.3.23 testsuite
with 3.3.23? If so I am surprised that 3.3.23 shows less user time
than 3.2.
The reason this is surprising is that there are MANY more tests in
3.3.23 than in 3.2. The long fifth batch consists of new tests. The
first four batches are mainly old tests. I suppose I should go back
and run the 3.2 regressions and see how long they take.
I'm confused by the fourth column 23:24.91. That would seem to be
the elapsed time but not that many hours have elapsed since the
3.3.23 release.
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, bump, 2003/07/15
- RE: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, Hellwig Geisse, 2003/07/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, Marco Scheurer, 2003/07/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, Marco Scheurer, 2003/07/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, bump, 2003/07/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, Paul Pogonyshev, 2003/07/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 3.3.23, bump, 2003/07/17