[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch
From: |
SP Lee |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:21:21 -0800 |
> Evan wrote:
> > > +Pattern EJ102
> > > +#spl 3.5.5
> > > +
> > > +?XX..
> > > +.O*O. block is mandatory. Tenuki is disasterous
> > > +.....
> > > +.....
> > > +-----
> > > +
> > > +:8,J
> >
> > Is a full J classification needed for these patterns? Is j or t
> > sufficient instead? J classifications are valued highly enough that
> > they can cause problems in some cases.
>
> Maybe this pattern is too general too? How about adding something
> like
>
> !weak(A)
>
> where A is the X string.
>
> Paul
>
>
I think we need a complete example for the need of constraints. I
couldn't imagine why this move is wrong when X string is weak. One thing
is sure. When X plays on *, O can't block any more and the two O stones
become as weak as dead compared to the three X stones.
SP Lee
- [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP lee, 2004/02/22
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, Evan Daniel, 2004/02/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP Lee, 2004/02/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/02/24
- [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, md, 2004/02/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, SP Lee, 2004/02/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, SP Lee, 2004/02/26