[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] fast_defense() improvement

From: Paul Pogonyshev
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] fast_defense() improvement
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 23:23:13 +0300
User-agent: KMail/1.6.52

Portela Fernando wrote:
> A revised patch. The 'heuristical' stuff has been removed. Still no
> breakage. Performance improvement is down to around 1%.

Well, 4% is of course much better than 1%.  Maybe you could prove
that the original patch was safe (i.e. that the defender could
actually get the "virtual" liberties by connecting the strings
together)?  Or if it was not, make it so?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]