RE: [gnugo-devel] 3.4 vs 3.6 against MFG

[David Fotland]

Did you check the time settings?  If you don't give it enough time it will
play at a weaker
playing level.  You can see that because the level number on the computer
button will change.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden 
> On Behalf Of David G Doshay
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 6:32 PM
> To: GNU Go development
> Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.4 vs 3.6 against MFG
> 
> 
> On 7, Mar 2005, at 4:32 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> > I wonder if your copy of Many Faces is somehow
> > broke. For example, look at move 104 in the last game, 
> throwing away 
> > the corner. (B still has a chance to live at move 110.)
> >
> > Yes, GNU Go sometimes makes moves that are just as
> > bad as this when the owl code misfires. But on the
> > whole this B doesn't seem to play as positively as
> > usual from Many Faces. It seems to have a different
> > style than I expect. Does it have a version number?
> 
> 11.0
> 
> On 7, Mar 2005, at 5:04 PM, Douglas Ridgway wrote:
> >
> > Very interesting! Do you have any data on H0 with GNU Go playing
> > white? I
> > seem to recall that it did worse with white than black.
> 
> I guess I could run another set of games like that, but no, 
> we do not have that now.
> >
> > And are you by any chance using the fuseki db patches I 
> posted back in 
> > November / December? It's not been added, I believe due to concerns 
> > about how much disk space it will occupy, but the additional 
> > variability should
> > be particularly important for running lots of games for testing and
> > statistics. For me, this was in fact the main point of the new db.
> 
> GNU Go was just the release version 3.6 with no patches.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>