[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] defn of open-source
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] defn of open-source |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:59:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> this is only indirectly related to gnumed:
>
> looking in oscar and sapdb source, it seems that a lot of it is still
> binary; does OS mean everything is source, and it might be somewhere
> else in the directory tree , or can a package be "OS" and still have
> significant parts not in source?
The former Yes the latter No.
Source must be *there* and openly accessible but it need not
be the only distributed form of the thing.
If an open source package requires a certain version of
another easily accessible OS package and it ships a suitable
binary version thereof it must then NOT necessarily also ship
the source of that other package (except any changes to that
source).
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346