[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] states missing in database
From: |
Richard Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] states missing in database |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:36:27 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
I don't beleive users should have the ablity to add states to a database
without verification from a central control as you suggest. I know this may
inconvenience users at first but it is the only way to not pollute the
database lookup tables. I would think that by the time (sigh!, hopefully,
sometime) gnumed gets into use we should have this sort of stuff pretty much
down pat.
ie agree - do not add require pre-existance, but include message to email
details to wherever you feel appropriate.
Ricahrd
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 09:05 am, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Richard, all,
>
> how should states not in the database be handled ?
>
> Add them as the user types them ?
>
> Add them after getting confirmation (and thusly hopefully a
> double-check on correctness) from the user ?
>
> Do not add them - require them to pre-exist ?
>
> Karsten