|
From: | J Busser |
Subject: | Re: [Gnumed-devel] emrjounalplugin.py comments further html work |
Date: | Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:39:51 -0700 |
At 10:50 AM +1000 9/19/05, Horst Herb wrote:
Don't think of it as a diagnosis then, think of it as a problem list. How else would you be able to quickly browse a patient's history if encounters weren't labelled with something meaningful? Even if you have ten encounters labelled as "vague unspecific symptoms" it is most helpful, because then really alarm bells should ring - whereas 10 unlabelled episodes are far less likely to draw your attention
Horst, in your mini-gnumed is each of your visit SOAP notes a single row in a clinical notes table?
And how are your many-to-one relationships between multiple problems, and a particular progress note, stored in the mini-gnumed backend? I don't believe GNUmed proper, as its schema is currently defined, would support that (?)
Karsten, are these approaches (current GNUmed vs Horst's in which a single note record can be linked to multiple problems) incompatible in the same schema?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |