[Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints

[Gour]

>>>>> "Jerzy" == Jerzy Luszawski <address@hidden> writes:

Forgot to reply to this part in my previous email...

Jerzy> The rationale would be different priority: when user finds a bug
Jerzy> in production version, it should be fixed ASAP, while bugs found
Jerzy> in developers' versions can be worked upon without rush, 

For handling different priorities and stuff , tracker uses different
kinds of meta data such as (e.g. for priority - Importance):

Affects   Status  Importance   Assigned to  Milestone


which, imho, eliminate the need for different places to handle the same
category of information (bug reports).

For example, Bazaar has atm 1057 Open bugs, 3 are Critical, 212 New and
963 Unassigned. No need to explain that different Linux distros are
using different versions, plus Windows users, Mac...

Importance has the following possible states:

Unknown
Critical
High
Medium
Low
Wishlist
Undecided 

so, it's not hard to put a query to get only what one is interested to
work on.

Similar to Status states and other components of the bug-report.


I am proposing it 'cause I strongly believe it will make life of all of
us (devs & users) easier and we'll be more productive in bringing GNUmed
to a higher-level.

Sincerely,
Gour

-- 

Gour  | Zagreb, Croatia  | GPG key: C6E7162D
----------------------------------------------------------------

pgpXtUWDeTZpC.pgp
Description: PGP signature