[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:27:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:54:53AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
>
> > 6) we have been having discussion about the difference between clinical
> > (disease) chronology -- as expressed by clin_when -- versus care /
> > awareness and documentation chronology, as expressed by modified) when. I
> > recently posted that both are important. I (mis?) understood that the EMR
> > tree already used clin_when but it is not reflected by what I had put
> > into the "Noted at Age or Year" fields.
>
> It now does (the Journal, that is) - in CVS head. And if it
> is NULL it uses the start time of the associated encounter.
>
> The health issues in the tree are ordered *alphabetically* !
> The users I asked wanted it that way.
>
> > so I am wondering if this reflects that 2005 maybe only went into the
> > field
> >
> > clin.health_issue.age_noted
> It did but the view for the _journal uses it to create the
> clin_when.
>
> > but better also be copied into the clin.clin_narrative.clin_when
> There is no such row by default.
>
> > -- however what date to input when only the year or age, and not the
> > month and date, were known?
>
> That is unsolved.
>
> Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346