Re: [Gnumed-devel] LaTeX contest for referral letter

[Jim Busser]

On 2010-01-20, at 1:30 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 04:37:29PM -0800, Jim Busser wrote:
> 
>> (in the output) ... "Any information below this point can not be assumed 
>> valid and the above physician will not be held responsible."
>> 
>> ... was it meant to be wrapped inside a GPG signature?
> 
> Which would be useful on a printed sheet of paper how ?

(a) if we are talking paper I did not understand how information above the 
point should be considered valid since it could have been altered

(b) if we are talking providing the patient a digital copy of the output then 
maybe that could be signed but on thinking it through I am not sure whether you 
can have in a Latex document a GPG begin and end above and below the signed 
content where the signed content could be printed on paper whereas the GPG 
parts could be in non-printing sections of the document.