[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom) |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:08:38 -0800 |
On 2010-01-29, at 12:37 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>> Jim wrote:
>>
>> PS I updated the wiki page
>>
>> http://wiki.gnumed.de/bin/view/Gnumed/GnumedUserInterface
>
> Thanks. I notice one issue on that page: going to Manage
> master data -> Workplace plugins and activating GNUmed
> Default will NOT load that workplace on the next start. For
> that to happen a config file needs to be edited.
In the cvs -- within the file which is used as a more or less reference file --
:
gm-from-cvs.conf
there is a line
#name = <a workplace name>
so why not add an uncommented copy of this line immediately below it:
name = GNUmed Default
after all, some real values are supplied elsewhere within this file so why not
a "real value" here?
Can this be part of 0.6.2? If this change would be made, would the packager be
asked (and able) to make this to be copied to become the new
~/.gnumed/gnumed.conf
or is the principle to not alter a user's config once it (might have been)
altered by previously running GNUmed?
- [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom, David Mackenzie, 2010/01/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom, David Mackenzie, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom, Jim Busser, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/28
- Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Jim Busser, 2010/01/28
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom),
Jim Busser <=
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Jim Busser, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/30
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Jim Busser, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Jim Busser, 2010/01/29
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/30
- Re: Upgrade inbox messages (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] No tabs at the bottom), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/30