Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message

[Karsten Hilbert]

>  i'd go with that.  that just leaves ORC+OBR which goes into
> clin.lab_request to be merged.
> 
>  i'm inclined to believe it's obr.results_rptstatus_chng_datetime
> (which goes into clin.lab_request.results_reported_when).
> 
>  the only thing that leaves me "uncomfortable" is the fact that the
> encounters themselves are obviously going to have to be merged, too.
> perhaps... perhaps it is enough that the clin.lab_request data and
> clin.test_result is going to be moved away from one of them, and
> merged into the other.
> 
>  i'm inclined to say that the priority is first by encounter_type -
> i.e. if it's "lab import data" then it's the lowest priority; if both
> encounters are "lab import data" or if both encounters are _not_ "lab
> import data", then the oldest of the two should be selected ...
> probably by clin.encounter.started?

See how this encounter abuse is getting really ugly really quickly ?

This HAS to go.

Karsten
-- 
GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 ¿/mtl.!*
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl