Re: [gnuspeech-contact] gnuspeech & latin / vergil, plainchant (fwd)

[D.R. Hill]

Yes, those are the bones of the process.

I should have mentioned, though it may not help very much, that the tube 
model itself will run on any machine.  Although the NeXT version was 
written in DSP56000 code, we also had a more refined model writtwen 
in 'C', the former being "real-time" and the latter about 10 times 
real time on the processors of the day.  Now even the 'C' version 
will run in better than real time on any reasonable processor (both 
were designed and written by Leonard Manzara, based on the work of 
Julius Smith and Perry Cook at CCRMA, Stanford, BTW).

The tube model requires the parameters produced by Monet as output as 
input.

-------
David Hill, Prof. Emeritus, Computer Science  |  Imagination is more       |
U. Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4       |  important than knowledge  |
address@hidden OR address@hidden   |         (Albert Einstein)  |
http://www.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~hill             |  Kill your television      |

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 address@hidden wrote:

> That was a useful summary of how to go about adding a new language to 
> gnuspeech. Would the process and options be essentially the same for a 
> living language?