[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:51:57 +0000 (GMT) |
> We'd rather work on fixing the fact that when you type 'make all' a second
> time after everything is build, *nothing* must be executed (by *nothing* I
> mean *nothing*, there should be no subprocesses except 'make'). At the
> moment this is nearly so, but not exactly, at least for bundles,
> frameworks and applications, and this is where most of the installation
> problems happen.
I've done an attempt at this, at least for bundles and applications.
It's sort of not trivial, but - assuming that what I did works :-), the
new code should also be very efficient.
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, (continued)
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Adam Fedor, 2002/12/09
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/10
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Helge Hess, 2002/12/11
- Re: Header cleanliness [was: removing the 'make install'-->'makeall' dependency], Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/11
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/11
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Alexander Malmberg, 2002/12/16
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, David Ayers, 2002/12/17
- Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency, Nicola Pero, 2002/12/19
- Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/12/19
- Re: Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/12/19
- Re: Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/12/19
- Re: Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, Nicola Pero, 2002/12/19
- Re: Problem with autogsdoc and GSFusedSilica.h, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/12/19