[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:32:10 -0700 |
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 02:36 AM, David Ayers wrote:
Giulio Cesare Solaroli wrote:
I have no problem at all to contribute the code to FSF, but there are
some issues that must be resolved:
- our frameworks use some of the Omni frameworks; before committing
everything to the FSF this dependency must be removed; this should
not be a huge problem, but must be investigated;
- some code snips have been taken from mailing-list messages; I have
asked the original authors an informal permission when we did the
first submission to SourceForge, but I think an further check should
be done before giving the copyright to FSF (all the authors are cited
in the source files);
This is an issue, I believe. If you can't get the copyright
assignment, kill those bits, add a comment about what they did and we
can reimplement them.
- we subclass OCUnit classes so Sente too must contribute its code to
FSF for complete integration.
Eventhough, that would be nice, I don't think this is absolutly
necessary for a contribution. GNUstep depends on other free code that
isn't a GNU project. It might be an issue if we ever wanted to make
this testing framework the "official" GNUstep testing framework.
I don't think it's absolutely necessary for it to be a GNU package.
It's not critical to the USE of gdl2 (AFAIK, let me know otherwise).
Just an appropriate GPL-compatible license would be all that is
necessary. Unless you feel strongly that otherwise, it doesn't matter
to me.
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, (continued)
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Manuel Guesdon, 2003/03/12
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/12
- Re[2]: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Manuel Guesdon, 2003/03/13
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Giulio Cesare Solaroli, 2003/03/26
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/26
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Stéphane Corthésy, 2003/03/26
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Giulio Cesare Solaroli, 2003/03/26
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Giulio Cesare Solaroli, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1,
Adam Fedor <=
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Marco Scheurer, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, David Ayers, 2003/03/27
- Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1, Marco Scheurer, 2003/03/27