I think that GNUstep is stable enough to be 1.0
As someone said: Evolution is not about being the best, but good enough. :-) And
it is true not only in bology, if you look how other SW looks like.
In addition, how can GNUstep have some slashdot publicity on the 1.0 release? I
do not know how it works, but often I see gnome and kde being there.
What do you think?
Stefan Urbanek
----- Preposlaná správa od Adam Fedor <address@hidden> -----
Dátum: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:52:27 -0600
Od: Adam Fedor <address@hidden>
Odpovedať:Adam Fedor <address@hidden>
Predmet:Re: GNUstep on freshmeat
Pre: address@hidden
Sounds useful. A while back, when base was stable, but gui wasn't, we
created the 'LaunchPad' name for the non-gui part of GNUstep. That
showed that GNUstep was a stable package.
I've recently had problems with certain versions of base and gui not
working together, so it would useful to group a know set of working
releases together into one 'super-package'.
On Sep 22, 2004, at 8:42 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Thanks, it works.
Btw. would it be possible to assign single version number for whole
GNUstep core
packages? Because there is single entry for whole GNUstep, and there
is no
reason for having different ones for -base and -gui. Perhaps we can
discuss it
on the -dev mailing list. I would suggest to start with 1.0.0 as -base
is
already > 1.0 and GUI is stable enough on *nix platforms. We should
consider
GUI being mature enough not only for marketing purposes, even
internally we
know that it is < 1.0.
What do you think?
Stefan
<snip>
----- Koniec preposlanej správy -----
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev