[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gomd-devel] <DAEMON>: working on the SCX
From: |
Matthias Rechenburg |
Subject: |
Re: [gomd-devel] <DAEMON>: working on the SCX |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:38:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
Hey JP,
On Donnerstag 11 September 2003 02:46, Gian Paolo Ghilardi wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm working on the SCX feature.
> Actually I can run a program in a separate process and, finally, I get the
> child output from the main process.
> I've still a problem with the execXX() family of calls. Some programs like
> "ls" work fine but others like "find", not!
no idea yet. how can i test it ? is it already in the cvs ?
.... btw: i changed my mind and now i also think that it would be
nice to support long-running commands if possible ;))
>
> BTW: these day I'm busy (studying Economics for an exam (19 Sept)) but,
> when I can, I continue with gomd devel.
have a good exam
> I want to release the beta ASAP.
ok :)
>
> Byez.
>
> Johnny: I like pthreads. Commoncpp provides a Thread wrapper class (based
> on pthread, I suppose) but it's not so handy as I'd like it was.
> ATM the code uses standard fork() but I'd like to use threads.
mhmm, ok, which advantages are giving pthreads above forks ?
..... forked procs may even migrate ;) pthreads don't
>
> <rejected>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gomd-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomd-devel
all the best and many thanks again for all your work,
Matt
--
E-mail : address@hidden
www : http://www.openmosixview.com
an openMosix-cluster management GUI
(A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network?