gomd-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gomd-devel] Re: <GOMD> GOMDVIEW & DAEMON updated


From: Matthias Rechenburg
Subject: [gomd-devel] Re: <GOMD> GOMDVIEW & DAEMON updated
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:08:15 +0000
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Hey JP,

On Samstag 10 April 2004 17:58, Gian Paolo Ghilardi wrote:
> Hi Matt.
>
> 1)Committed to CVS updated files for gomdview.
> I post again here the CVS notes for the updated files. :)
>
> << CVS NOTES >>
>
> IN gomdview.h
> (+) libgomd.h looks for commonc++ hedaers, so I've added I/usr/local/c++2
> header dir.

ok

> (+) added a new lg object (not pointer!) shared in the whole file

best ! as mentioned much better

>
> IN gomdview.cpp
> (-) removed all the dynloaders. We use the new lg object declared in
> gomdview.h.

yep

>
> IN Makefile
> (+) we directly use libgomd.h as we need to load the library dynamically no
> more.
> (-) killed -f-noexecptions falg as it generated compilation errors with
> commonc++ headers
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
>
> 2)Added new "exec con" option to the gomd daemon to execute a command on a
> specific node (as required by Matt).

cool, thanks

> In the CVS note (below) the special synopsis for this option.
>
> << CVS NOTES >>
> IN chSupport.cpp/connHandler.cpp
> (+) added support for new "con" option, used to execute a command on a
> specific node (via its gomd daemon).
>
> IN supported_cmds
> (+) added new option "con"! ("con" stands for "command on")
>
> NOTE:
> For the command execution on a specific node (con option where "con" stands
> for "command on"),
> there is a minimal change in the synopsis:
>
> - SYNOPSIS:
>   [exec] con (NODE_ID) COMMAND PARAMS
>
> - EXAMPLE
>   exec con (1) ls /usr => executes "ls /usr" on node with ID=1
> Matt: tell me if it works. :)Bye.<rejected>

yep, will do soon

have a nice weekend,

Matt
-- 
E-mail  :  address@hidden
www     : http://www.openmosixview.com
an openMosix-cluster management GUI

(A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]