gomd-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gomd-devel] Re: <GOMDVIEW> Refresh prob.


From: Gian Paolo Ghilardi
Subject: [gomd-devel] Re: <GOMDVIEW> Refresh prob.
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:47:30 +0200

Hi Matt.

Please checkout CVS code.
Here gomdview and gomdprocs compile from everywhere (importing headers from
/usr/include/gomd directory).

Matt: please try compiling gomdview/gomdprocs code (this after re-installing
libgomd => so /usr/include/gomd directory will be created and filled with
the libgomd headers).
Thanks. :)

Bye.

<rejected>


<< CVS NOTES >>

IN libgomd/Makefile
(+) libgomd headers now will be placed in new /usr/include/gomd directory
(so gomdview can be compiled from everywhere :) )

IN gomdprocs/gomdprocs.h & gomdview/gomdview.h
(m) modified header file includes (as libgomd.h now is placed in
/usr/include/gomd directory)

IN gomd/gomd/contrib/shell/cw_tools{cw_chmod,cw_cp,cw_mkdir,cw_rm}
(f) change to "head" call (-1 => -n1)



----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Rechenburg" <address@hidden>
To: "Gian Paolo Ghilardi" <address@hidden>
Cc: "gomd developers mailing list" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: <GOMDVIEW> Refresh prob.


> Ciao again,
>
> On Dienstag 13 April 2004 19:55, Gian Paolo Ghilardi wrote:
> > Hi Matt :)
> >
> > Ok. You win => I agree :)
>
> ;) no winning on discussions
>
> >
> > Now I'll update the Makefiles.
> > Just a thing: what about creating a /usr/include/gomd directory and
putting
> > there the files?
> > So the include will be #include <gomd/libgomd.h>
> >
> > Ok?
>
> yep, good idea ;) just be sure to check also
> all other libgomd headers for ../../ stuff.
> .. and please check if gomdview compiles
> then with #include <libgomd.h>    ;)
>
> >
> > <rejected>
>
> thanks + stay tuned,
>
> Matt
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthias Rechenburg" <address@hidden>
> > To: "Gian Paolo Ghilardi" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: "gomd developers mailing list" <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: <GOMDVIEW> Refresh prob.
> >
> > > Hi back to you,
> > >
> > > On Dienstag 13 April 2004 19:35, Gian Paolo Ghilardi wrote:
> > > > Hi Matt.
> > > >
> > > > > > > mhmm, the not-online nodes can be the reason for that.
> > > > > > > will re-check
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks. Why the nodes appear sorted from the last to the first
> > > > > > (5->4->3->2->1)? :)
> > > > >
> > > > > this is the sequence i got from "get nl" i guess
> > > >
> > > > Uhm... not => check the screenshot :)))
> > >
> > > ok, do not know yet, maybe the gomdview internal nodelist<list> sorts
> >
> > wrong
> >
> > > > > > What's your opinion?
> > > > >
> > > > > ;) i told your my opinion and about the problems i have
> > > > > with gomdview. It should be compileable in every dir
> > > > > and not depend on ../../libgomd.h but on #include libgomd.h
> > > > > Otherwise you (users) will have troubles e.g. in building rpm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try that :
> > > > > Change in gomdview.h
> > > > > #include "../../libgomd.h"
> > > > > to
> > > > > #include <libgomd.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > and see if you can compile it
> > > > > (after installing the libgomd by "make install" as root)
> > > >
> > > > What about include the needed headers in the gomdview? (sorry for
being
> >
> > so
> >
> > > > irritating :) )
> > >
> > > no prob
> > >
> > > > (However I can change the makefiles in a few min, if you want. :) )
> > >
> > > to my mind we/you should change this and not make our users depend
> > > on our gomd directory structure.
> > > That is why we install it in /usr/include (system wide)
> > >
> > > > Bye.
> > > >
> > > > <rejected>
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > > --
> > > E-mail :  address@hidden
> > > www : http://www.openmosixview.com
> > > an openMosix-cluster management GUI
> > >
> > > Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
>
> --
> E-mail :  address@hidden
> www : http://www.openmosixview.com
> an openMosix-cluster management GUI
>
> "activate viruses in your e-mails?"
>  (Y)es (N)o (R)andom
>
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]