[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: porting to hppa-ipl
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: porting to hppa-ipl |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:02:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:29, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > set -e; gcc -Ihello -I./hello -I. -Iinclude -I./include -Wall -W
> > -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes
> > -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -g -Os -fno-builtin -M hello/hello.c |
> > sed 's,hello\.o[ :]*,hello_mod-hello_hello.o hello_mod-hello_hello.d : ,g'
> > > hello_mod-hello_hello.d; [ -s hello_mod-hello_hello.d ] || rm -f
> > hello_mod-hello_hello.d In file included from include/grub/normal.h:28,
> > from hello/hello.c:27:
> > include/grub/script.h:27:29: error: grub_script.tab.h: No such file or
> > directory
> >
> > Generates a zero-byte file which is promptly deleted. So this file is
> > never generated.
>
> I took a look at the log. It says that the dependency generation fails at the
> first time, as grub_script.tab.h does not exist, but it is performed again
> after grub_script.tab.h is generated. Doesn't this happen in your
> environment?
Nope, grub_script.tab.h is never generated on my system. It looks like
on other arch's it's generated as a side effect of programs defined in
conf/*. Because I'm still trying to get the base set of things built,
the missing dependancy causes me grief. That's why I think it needs an
added dependancy.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it.
- Voltaire