[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving away from CVS
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: moving away from CVS |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:28:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Johan Rydberg <address@hidden> writes:
> Marco Gerards <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> I agree; I think there are far better replacements for CVS. Personally I
>>> would highly recommend mercurial, but I suppose everybody has their own
>>> preferences. I noticed that Savannah, where the GRUB tree is currently
>>> hosted, offers subversion support...
>>
>> I like subversion because it solves most problems, while I do not have
>> to learn something new.
>
> Subversion still does not track merges, which I think was the original
> reason to why this discussion started.
>
> Personally I would rather use bzr, but I know our maintainer does not
> like it that much (because of the lack of commit hooks.) But I
> wouldn't mind switching to subversion, keep in mind that it will not
> be any better than CVS.
It is better than CVS, but just not in this specific case. Anyways, I
do not mind that much about using bzr. Almost anything is better than
CVS. :-)
--
Marco
- Support for reading LVM volumes, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/08/13
- Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/08/13
- Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/08/13
- Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/08/13
- Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/08/13
- Re: moving away from CVS, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/08/13
- Re: moving away from CVS, Marco Gerards, 2006/08/14
- Re: moving away from CVS, Johan Rydberg, 2006/08/14
- Re: moving away from CVS,
Marco Gerards <=
- Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/08/15
Re: Support for reading LVM volumes, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/08/15