[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditio
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:26:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:22:41PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> Then I guess the Apple compiler won't accepted %ds: either, so if we
> want to use %ds, we should omit it.
Btw, it's Apple assembler that matters here. AFAIK their compiler is GCC.
I think those checks would need some adjustment, or it'll be a mess when
we want to support GNU binutils on MacOS.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)),
Robert Millan <=
- Re: about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
[PATCH] s/GRUB_MEMORY_MACHINE_LINK_ADDR/GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_LINK_ADDR/g (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- [PATCH] fix for loading modules from read-only memory area (Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] fix for loading modules from read-only memory area (Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/25