[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:40:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:16:24PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> I don't think we should rename "byte_order" to "unused". Just because
> we doesn't use it now to determine the endianess,
Shouldn't we be checking for it? (and error out if mismatch).
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/14
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Pavel Roskin, 2009/08/14
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/19
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Pavel Roskin, 2009/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/23
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Robert Millan, 2009/08/23
- Re: [PATCH] Split big and little endian BeFS and AtheFS, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/28